Stalin Reads Machiavelli The consequences of considering vice a virtue. May 12, Vladimir Tismaneanu Author's note: This essay is written in memory of Yelena Bonner who, together with Andrei Sakharov and other heroic dissidents, held truth, dignity, and liberty as non-negotiable values. But he adamantly refuses to unequivocally condemn Stalin:
Tuesday, April 12, Joseph Stalin: Was he a Machiavellian Prince? Machiavelli speaks about many qualities that a true leader or prince should have, ones that will ensure his dominating power and influence for a long time.
He is known worldwide as the murderer of millions and the betrayer of the original Leninist Bolshevik revolution. However, was Joseph Stalin a Machiavellian prince and how did he display those qualities?
Throughout his merciless reign, he demonstrated many Machiavellian qualities: Therefore, I do believe that Joseph Stalin was a Machiavellian prince and this short essay will display how I arrived at that conclusion.
The rapid industrialization and agricultural collectivization of the s also depicted much military involvement, as a sort of threatening coercion of the peasantry and middle class by the Soviet government, which shows that Stalin was very much a military leader, and he seemingly always had a military plan boiling up in his mind.
Furthermore, Machiavelli continued to state in The Prince that an ideal leader should be reputed a miser, instead of being hated for trying to be too generous thereby exhausting resources and taxing the people.
This was the precise case with Stalin and the 'starvation policies' he implemented for the Russian peasantry as well as the limited food rations: Stalin also used starvation in his war against the peasants In addition, Machiavelli wrote in his political treatise that a prince must be feared, not hated in order to keep order and justice: The purges were a systematic method of eliminating all opposition to his extreme social and economic policies.
He first started with the persecution and later executions of two of the most prominent former party leaders and Leftists, Grigory Zinoviev and Lev Kamenev, falsely charging them with the assassination of Sergey Kirov.
Joseph Stalin was the true epitome of fear in the twentieth century. Lastly, it is written in The Prince that regarding two warring states, a prince should choose a side, and never be neutral: This invasion changed everything. And so, Stalin was forced to choose the Allied side, fighting with Britain, France and later the United States against the invading Nazis.
This translates into if the prince is more powerful, then his allies are under his command; if the prince's allies are stronger, they will always feel a certain obligation to the prince for his help. In this case, Stalin's USSR was bigger and more powerful than Churchill's Britain and Roosevelt's USA, therefore, when Europe's post-war reorganization negotiations were occurring at the Yalta Conference, Stalin clearly possessed the upper hand in regards to the territorial and political organization of Poland.
Stalin also promised Churchill and Roosevelt that there most definitely would be a provisional government that will hold free democratic elections.
Evidently, that never occurred and so a communist Soviet government was set up, completely betraying the Poles who fought for the freedom of many other countries, not just theirs .
We'll do it our own way later Therefore, since both democratic leaders had no experience with dealing with Stalin, Stalin clearly had the dominating hand. In the end, Stalin allying with the Allies benefited him a lot, because he had the chance to create the Eastern bloc along with a string of Soviet Socialist states and Soviet satellite states, instead of having to pay reparations and cede land to the victorious Allies like the Axis Powers did .
I thus conclude that Stalin displayed perfectly the Machiavellian qualities of:à Chokier de Surlet, Ioanne Thesaurus politicorum aphorismorum. repetitæ lectionis, divisus in tres partes: Quarum Prima, Principum, consiliariorum, aulicorum legatorum Secunda Pars, Notas complectitur in onosandri strategicum Tertia, Utrique conueniens de legationibus separatim.
Stalin and Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince Essay The general theory of political relations and administration that the Founder of Modern Political Science - Stalin and Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince Essay introduction. All in all, Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin, and Vladimir Lenin were embodiments of the theories Machiavelli introduced in “The Prince”.
They ruled and based their states on militaristic power, they ruled their states through cruelty and pain over compassion and love, and kept the well being of the state in mind in every decision they made.
Stalin truly imbibed the virtue of courage and inner strength – as it is what Machiavelli described to be a supreme attributed of a ruler. Stalin believes he is a complete embodiment of Machiavelli’s description of a true ruler: full as a man; hardworking; courageous and excellent in decision making.
Machiavelli’s The Prince: Examples of Machiavellian Leaders Essay - Arguably, the most Machiavellian leader to ever exist would be Joseph Stalin.
He abided by three major Machiavellian methods that were stated in the Prince: the ends justifies the means, crush any opposition, and displaying a false character. Niccolo Machiavelli presented espouses the attainment of successful administration and political leading by whatever means it takes. His monumental book “The Prince” hence depicted that swayers and leaders must achieve control and power by any agencies necessary.